Everything about The Apparent Magnitude totally explained
The
apparent magnitude (
m) of a celestial body is a
measure of its
brightness as seen by an observer on
Earth, normalized to the value it would have in the absence of the
atmosphere. The brighter the object appears, the lower the numerical value of its
magnitude.
Explanation
The scale upon which magnitude is now measured has its origin in the
Hellenistic practice of dividing those stars visible to the naked eye into six
magnitudes. The brightest stars were said to be of first magnitude (
m = 1), while the faintest were of sixth magnitude (
m = 6), the limit of
human visual perception (without the aid of a
telescope). Each grade of magnitude was considered to be twice the brightness of the following grade (a
logarithmic scale). This somewhat crude method of indicating the brightness of stars was popularized by
Ptolemy in his
Almagest, and is generally believed to have originated with
Hipparchus. This original system didn't measure the magnitude of the
Sun.
In 1856,
Pogson formalized the system by defining a typical first magnitude star as a star that's 100 times as bright as a typical sixth magnitude star; thus, a first magnitude star is about 2.512 times as bright as a second magnitude star. The fifth root of 100 is known as
Pogson's Ratio. Pogson's scale was originally fixed by assigning
Polaris a magnitude of 2. Astronomers later discovered that Polaris is slightly variable, so they first switched to
Vega as the standard reference star, and then switched to using tabulated zero points for the measured fluxes. The magnitude depends on the wavelength band (see below).
The modern system is no longer limited to 6 magnitudes or only to visible light. Very bright objects have
negative magnitudes. For example,
Sirius, the brightest star of the
celestial sphere, has an apparent magnitude of −1.47. The modern scale includes the
Moon and the
Sun; the full Moon has an apparent magnitude of −12.6 and the Sun has an apparent magnitude of −26.73. The
Hubble Space Telescope has located stars with magnitudes of 30 at visible wavelengths and the
Keck telescopes have located similarly faint stars in the infrared.
Apparent Magnitude |
Range of Magnitude |
| −5 |
−4.51 to −5.50 |
| −4 |
−3.51 to −4.50 |
| −3 |
−2.51 to −3.50 |
| −2 |
−1.51 to −2.50 |
| −1 |
−0.51 to −1.50 |
| 0 |
−0.50 to 0.49 |
| 1 |
0.50 to 1.49 |
| 2 |
1.50 to 2.49 |
| 3 |
2.50 to 3.49 |
| 4 |
3.50 to 4.49 |
| 5 |
4.50 to 5.49 |
| 6 |
5.50 to 6.49 |
| 7 |
6.50 to 7.49 |
Apparent magnitudes of known celestial objects>
| App. Mag. |
Celestial object |
| −26.73 |
Sun (449,000 times brighter than full moon) |
| −12.6 |
Full Moon |
| −8.0 |
Maximum brightness of an iridium flare |
| −6.0 |
The Crab Supernova (SN 1054) of 1054 AD (6500 light years away) |
| −4.7 |
Maximum brightness of Venus and the International Space Station (when the ISS is at its perigee and fully lit by the sun) |
| −3.9 |
Faintest objects observable during the day with naked eye |
| −3.7 |
Minimum brightness of Venus |
| −3.0 |
Maximum brightness of Mars |
| −2.8 |
Maximum brightness of Jupiter |
| −1.9 |
Maximum brightness of Mercury |
| −1.47 |
Brightest star (except for the sun) at visible wavelengths: Sirius |
| −0.7 |
Second-brightest star: Canopus |
| −0.24 |
Maximum brightness of Saturn |
| 0 |
The zero point by definition: This used to be Vega (see references for modern zero point) |
| 3 |
Faintest stars visible in an urban neighborhood with naked eye |
| 4.6 |
Maximum brightness of Ganymede |
| 5.5 |
Maximum brightness of Uranus |
| 6.5 |
Faintest stars observable with naked eye under perfect conditions |
| 6.7 |
Maximum brightness of Ceres |
| 7.7 |
Maximum brightness of Neptune |
| 9.1 |
Maximum brightness of 10 Hygiea |
| 9.5 |
Faintest objects visible with binoculars |
| 10.2 |
Maximum brightness of Iapetus |
| 12.9 |
Brightest quasar 3C 273 (2.4 Giga-light years away) |
| 13.65 |
Maximum brightness of Pluto (1,148 times fainter than naked-eye visibility) |
| 18.7 |
Maximum brightness of Eris |
| 23 |
Maximum brightness of Pluto's smallest moons Hydra and Nix |
| 27 |
Faintest objects observable in visible light with 8m ground-based telescopes |
| 30 |
Faintest objects observable in visible light with Hubble Space Telescope |
| 38 |
Faintest objects observable in visible light with planned OWL (2020) |
| (see also List of brightest stars) |
These are only approximate values at visible wavelengths (in reality the values depend on the precise bandpass used) — see
airglow for more details of telescope sensitivity.
As the amount of light received actually depends on the thickness of the Earth's atmosphere in the line of sight to the object, the apparent magnitudes are normalized to the value it would have in the absence of the atmosphere. The dimmer an object appears, the higher its apparent magnitude. Note that brightness varies with distance; an extremely bright object may appear quite dim, if it's far away. Brightness varies
indirectly with the square of the distance. The
absolute magnitude,
M, of a celestial body (outside of the solar system) is the apparent magnitude it would have if it were 10
parsecs (~32
light years) away; that of a planet (or other solar system body) is the apparent magnitude it would have if it were 1
astronomical unit away from both the
Sun and
Earth. The absolute magnitude of the Sun is 4.83 in the V band (yellow) and 5.48 in the B band (blue).
The apparent magnitude in the band x can be defined as (noting that
In terms of apparent magnitude, Sirius is 23.124 times brighter than Polaris the North Star.
The second thing to notice is that the scale is
logarithmic: the relative brightness of two objects is determined by the difference of their magnitudes. For example, a difference of 3.2 means that one object is about 19 times as bright as the other, because Pogson's ratio raised to the power 3.2 is 19.054607...
A common misconception is that the logarithmic nature of the scale is due to the fact that the human eye itself has a logarithmic response. In Pogson's time this was thought to be true (see Weber-Fechner law), but it's now believed that the response is a power law (see Stevens' power law).
Magnitude is complicated by the fact that light isn't monochromatic. The sensitivity of a light detector varies according to the wavelength of the light, and the way in which it varies depends on the type of light detector. For this reason, it's necessary to specify how the magnitude is measured in order for the value to be meaningful. For this purpose the UBV system is widely used, in which the magnitude is measured in three different wavelength bands: U (centred at about 350 nm, in the near ultraviolet), B (about 435 nm, in the blue region) and V (about 555 nm, in the middle of the human visual range in daylight). The V band was chosen for spectral purposes and gives magnitudes closely corresponding to those seen by the light-adapted human eye, and when an apparent magnitude is given without any further qualification, it's usually the V magnitude that's meant, more or less the same as visual magnitude.
Since cooler stars, such as red giants and red dwarfs, emit little energy in the blue and UV regions of the spectrum their power is often under-represented by the UBV scale. Indeed, some L and T class stars have an estimated magnitude of well over 100, since they emit extremely little visible light, but are strongest in infrared.
Measures of magnitude need cautious treatment and it's extremely important to measure like with like. On early 20th century and older orthochromatic (blue-sensitive) photographic film, the relative brightnesses of the blue supergiant Rigel and the red supergiant Betelgeuse irregular variable star (at maximum) are reversed compared to what our eyes see since this archaic film is more sensitive to blue light than it's to red light. Magnitudes obtained from this method are known as photographic magnitudes, and are now considered obsolete.
For objects within our Galaxy with a given absolute magnitude, 5 is added to the apparent magnitude for every tenfold increase in the distance to the object. This relationship doesn't apply for objects at very great distances (far beyond our galaxy), since a correction for General Relativity must then be taken into account due to the non-Euclidean nature of space.
Further Information
Get more info on 'Apparent Magnitude'.
|
External Link Exchanges
Do you know how hard it is to get a link from a large encyclopaedia? Well we're different and will prove it. To get a link from us just add the following HTML to your site on a relevant page:
<a href="http://apparent_magnitude.totallyexplained.com">Apparent magnitude Totally Explained</a>
Then simply click through this link from your web page. Our crawlers will verify your link, extract the title of your web page and instantly add a link back to it. If you like you can remove the words Totally Explained and embed the link in article text.
As long as your link remains in place, we'll keep our link to you right here. Please play fair - our crawlers are watching. Your site must be closely related to this one's topic. Any kind of spamming, dubious practises or removing the link will result in your link from us being dropped and, potentially, your whole site being banned. |